The Mongols Essays - Mongol Empire, Genghis Khan, Mongols

The Mongols It has been said that the Mongols were the most cruel and barbaric of the peoples that have roamed this earth. My research paper is on the greatest of the Mongols, Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan was, even in the lightest sense, a military genius. Genghis Khan almost conquered the world. He instilled in humankind a fear that lasted for ages. But what drove him to do it? Was it by chance? This paper will explain how the general's childhood molded the man into the best war general of the known world. The Mongols originally consisted of loosely organized nomadic tribes. (Nomadic refers to a tribe whose members wander and travel around, never staying in one place very long). They were considered barbarians, by European standards. They had no written language, and they were uneducated, except in warfare. Their land was in the most sense barren, for it was the Gobi Desert. In the Gobi, weather could change at a moments notice, from scorching heat to blustering cold. To protect themselves from the unforgiving cold, the Mongols smeared themselves with oil and grease. This offered sufficient protection, but they had to still worry about the wind, for the desert was barren, and with no trees to divert the wind, the gusts were sometimes enough to make riding on horseback difficult. Their culture was very unique. In the spring, meat, fur, and milk were abundant. In the winter, however, it was not. The Mongols evidently did not care much for their children, for they did not sacrifice their food for them. Whenever food was brought in during the winter, all of it was put in the a pot and then the order of people got it. The order of people were - the able-bodied men taking the first portions, the aged and the women received the pot next, and the children had to fight for the rest (Lamb 23). When there was a shortage of cattle, the children didn't survive so easily. Milk, one of their chief sources of nutrition, existed only in the form of kumiss, milk put in leather satchels, fermented and beaten. It was nourishment, and also intoxicating, especially to a kid of three or four years (Lamb 26). Their fires were not fueled by wood, since trees were scarce in the desert. Instead, it was fueled by cattle and horse dung, which had to make for a certainly unpleasant smell. When festivals came about, as they rarely did, big piles of dung were lit and the same order of the eating applied to the fire, with the women sometimes being able to sit! on the left of the fire. The children were not introduced to hardship; they were born into it. After they were weaned from their mothers milk to mare's milk, they were expected to manage almost entirely for themselves. The children learned to live by themselves, in houses, called yurts and they learned to organize hunts, stalking dogs and rats, beating them with crude, blunt clubs and arrows. They also learned to ride sheep by holding on to the wool. The yurts were made of felt, animal skin shaved close, stretched over wooden sticks, with an opening at the top to let out the smoke. Page 3 The felt was covered with white lime, and pictures were drawn onto it. This tent was serviceable, for its dome shaped top allowed it to resist the high winds (Fox 29). Endurance was life for the young Genghis Khan, called at birth Temujin, or "The Finest Steel". It was a name given to him by his father, the name of an enemy taken prisoner. Temujin's father was the Khan of the Yakka, or Great, Mongols. He had control of over 47,000 tents and his name was Yesukai (Lamb 24). Temujin had numerous duties, just as did the other boys of the camp. They had to fish the streams that the family passed on their trek. They looked after the family's horses, learning out of necessity to stay in the saddle for several days at a time, and to survive without food for three to four days. The boys watched the skyline for raiders and spent many nights in the snow without a

Can a Sample Argument Essay on Dress Code Help Win My Case?

Can a Sample Argument Essay on Dress Code Help Win My Case?There are plenty of times when a judge or the defendant can be hesitant to accept a sample argument essay on dress code. For example, an argument can be made that the plaintiff was wearing a too-short skirt while she stood in front of the defendant and her children.A young woman could claim that the defendant wasn't wearing pants that were wide enough to cover her thighs. The young woman might say that it is not fair for her to have to suffer the same humiliation as the teenager whose boyfriend wanted to see him out in public because he had no idea what it feels like to be naked in public.However, it's not likely that this argument will pass muster. An argument that draws a parallel between a public place and a woman's home will likely fail. Because a public place is much larger than a home, there would likely be a greater number of people present in the home where the defendant has been kicked out, which would make her testi mony inaccurate.In other words, a statement like 'her body was exposed in public' is likely to fail when an argument is based on the fact that the plaintiff was in a public place. Therefore, a lawyer may have to use a different form of evidence to get a similar result in order to win a case based on a statement like 'This woman is showing herself off in public.'When a judge or jury hears the details of a crime, they are likely to find a large difference between a short skirt and a man standing in front of the young woman with his children in tow. Therefore, a sample argument that has a large difference between a young woman in a skirt and the teenage boy whose boyfriend wants to see him out in public is going to be a stronger argument.Many arguments make these kinds of distinctions. In fact, they are often used to distinguish between two different situations. A statement like, 'This woman is wearing a very short skirt' could be an argument that the plaintiff in a case was wearing a very short skirt but an argument that the plaintiff was wearing a very long skirt could be an argument that the plaintiff was wearing a very long skirt but not quite long enough to cover the defendant's rear end.This can work to help a lawyer in many ways in a beautiful case that involves a violation of a dress code. It will be more difficult to win a case on a skirt comparison because it takes a different type of evidence to support a statement that relates to a very short skirt than it does to make a similar point regarding a long skirt.Still, in some cases a skirt comparison may be the best way to win a case. The best lawyers make these kinds of distinctions for their clients every day and the reason they do so is to ensure that the plaintiff is successful in their case.